From kde-core-devel Thu Feb 22 17:45:17 2007 From: "Aaron J. Seigo" Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 17:45:17 +0000 To: kde-core-devel Subject: Re: organizing kdebase Message-Id: <200702221045.18262.aseigo () kde ! org> X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kde-core-devel&m=117216632003831 MIME-Version: 1 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="--nextPart12241757.ydXpNqTxj7" --nextPart12241757.ydXpNqTxj7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On February 22, 2007, Richard Moore wrote: > I think the issue here is more that non-KDE applications that use > these tools to integrate into KDE should be able to depend on them to > be present. that's why they are in kdebase, and not in kdebase/apps or kdebase/workspac= e. perhaps "tools" is a better word than "utils" here then; "utils" seems to=20 imply "miscelaneous crud" which isn't true. nor was that my intention with= =20 this grouping. keeping runtime/ to mean "those applications which form the runtime=20 requirements of KDE applications" seems to be a good separate goal to me fo= r=20 reasons i've already stated. would runtime/ and tools/ be more palatable, or is that just arranging deck= =20 chairs? =2D-=20 Aaron J. Seigo humru othro a kohnu se GPG Fingerprint: 8B8B 2209 0C6F 7C47 B1EA EE75 D6B7 2EB1 A7F1 DB43 =46ull time KDE developer sponsored by Trolltech (http://www.trolltech.com) --nextPart12241757.ydXpNqTxj7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBF3dau1rcusafx20MRAmtbAJ9P+sQlQ52mprz7YTItXThZxXDJNQCfeih4 xWbZbDlASotXuhEz6vKzKuI= =sY/g -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart12241757.ydXpNqTxj7--