[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: kde-core-devel
Subject: Re: Can Q_GLOBAL_STATIC replace KStaticDelete ?
From: Thiago Macieira <thiago () kde ! org>
Date: 2007-01-17 16:52:27
Message-ID: 200701171752.39420.thiago () kde ! org
[Download RAW message or body]
Matthias Kretz wrote:
>On Wednesday 17 January 2007 12:51, Matthias Kretz wrote:
>> I'm working on a K_GLOBAL_STATIC macro right now...
>
>Patch is attached.
You used q_atomic_test_and_set_ptr in your code. This QAtomic code is the
whole reason why Q_GLOBAL_STATIC isn't documented right now: all of the
atomic code isn't documented.
Using Q_GLOBAL_STATIC is already risky, but if we get a promise it won't
change (and it probably won't), we can use it. But using the low-level
atomic methods may be even more of a problem...
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago (AT) macieira.info - thiago (AT) kde.org
PGP/GPG: 0x6EF45358; fingerprint:
E067 918B B660 DBD1 105C 966C 33F5 F005 6EF4 5358
[Attachment #3 (application/pgp-signature)]
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic