From kde-core-devel  Wed Jan 03 15:39:12 2007
From: Simon Hausmann <hausmann () kde ! org>
Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2007 15:39:12 +0000
To: kde-core-devel
Subject: Re: private slots
Message-Id: <200701031639.12700.hausmann () kde ! org>
X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kde-core-devel&m=116783876513642
MIME-Version: 1
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="--nextPart1472984.Zd7UGntrXJ"

--nextPart1472984.Zd7UGntrXJ
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-15"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

On Wednesday 03 January 2007 16:23, Thomas Zander wrote:
> On Wednesday 03 January 2007 16:05, Simon Hausmann wrote:
> > This slot is not intended for applications to call/use and it is
> > connected to the internal widgets. There's no need to have it in the
> > public API and exported. You can use the following instead:
> >
> > ...
> > private:
> > =A0 =A0 Q_PRIVATE_SLOT(d, void slotDateChanged())
> >
> > =A0 =A0 KDateWidgetPrivate *d;
> > ...
>
> How is this better than the following?
>
> private slots:
>   =A0 void slotDateChanged();

Because slotDateChanged() is a publically exported symbol. On non-Msvc=20
compilers you can still call it with #define private/public hacks. On Windo=
ws=20
you can't remove it at all without breaking binary compatibility (even if n=
o=20
application calls it).


Simon

--nextPart1472984.Zd7UGntrXJ
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD4DBQBFm84gWXvMThJCpvIRAq8ZAJ9AYtVjTuwHIPpytBGvr3BslHOdegCTBcl5
Oqg5I197mfk3E0brGxIGog==
=QiUT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart1472984.Zd7UGntrXJ--