--nextPart1691430.o8GscOFa7N
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

On Tuesday 19 December 2006 15:47, Zack Rusin wrote:
> > With news sites, blogs, (paper)articles all giving attention to the new
> > stuff, and the general idea that non-boring names tend to stick better =
in
> > peoples minds.
>
> And how does that apply to libraries at all? Are you saying that you will
> do such aggressive marketing of KDE that everyone on the world will know
> every KDE library name? Or are you saying that developers will come to KDE
> because of a neat name of a library? I just don't believe any of it, even
> for a second.

All I'm doing is sharing my experiences; and those are based on naming a=20
library 'Flake' and heavy marketing that resulted.
People nowadays come to us with ideas for the lib, they come to us with=20
questions on how this lib can help them. Etc.

That's all I'm trying to bring across here.
=2D-=20
Thomas Zander

--nextPart1691430.o8GscOFa7N
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBFh/8LCojCW6H2z/QRAgKOAJ9JcgJrqeyHCGYZQzI9CBqg7252MACgkium
IXiojlFci2IaaCqx72K2AB8=
=esn8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart1691430.o8GscOFa7N--