From kde-core-devel Tue Dec 19 14:18:43 2006 From: Thomas Zander Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 14:18:43 +0000 To: kde-core-devel Subject: Re: New special effects library Message-Id: <200612191518.44176.zander () kde ! org> X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kde-core-devel&m=116653788928840 MIME-Version: 1 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="--nextPart2664177.S1r2FFllWQ" --nextPart2664177.S1r2FFllWQ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Tuesday 19 December 2006 14:07, Zack Rusin wrote: > So as an engineer you're attracted to names and you'd join KDE because > libraries have cool names? I'd expect engineers to look at technologies n= ot > through their names but what they do With news sites, blogs, (paper)articles all giving attention to the new stu= ff,=20 and the general idea that non-boring names tend to stick better in peoples= =20 minds. Well, I guess many people choose to look at the hip sounding librari= es=20 before the boring libs. The question is if people will recall the kde3 FX library (which didn't hav= e=20 too much 'oomph') and disclaim this lib based on that perception. Renaming it to KGraphicsThatGetYouLaid or KSuperNova (be creative!) may hel= p=20 for those case. =2D-=20 Thomas Zander --nextPart2664177.S1r2FFllWQ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBFh/TECojCW6H2z/QRAnCGAKDqhZcREN1Xmq2Cs+t7yiQy4LcU/QCgly9u 2p88PUp7vXNjx3wnrAOs1wA= =KBCv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2664177.S1r2FFllWQ--