[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-core-devel
Subject:    Re: Okular moving
From:       Albert Astals Cid <aacid () kde ! org>
Date:       2006-11-13 20:11:06
Message-ID: 200611132111.06393.aacid () kde ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

A Dilluns 13 Novembre 2006 20:49, Allen Winter va escriure:
> On Monday, November 13, 2006 02:36:41 PM Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > A Dilluns 13 Novembre 2006 20:13, Wilfried Huss va escriure:
> > > Am Sonntag, 12. November 2006 22:34 schrieb Pino Toscano:
> > > > So, can we move okular to kdegraphics?
> > >
> > > So what would this mean for Ligature (formally known as Kviewshell)?
> >
> > Did you read any reference to Ligature/Kviewshell in Pino's mail?
> >
> > > If I remember correctly there has been made a decision, that no
> > > applications that are duplicating functionality will be allowed in the
> > > core modules.
> >
> > I don't remember such strong decision although i agree some people has
> > expressed this opinion, but for me, in a world where not all solutions
> > are perfect, i prefer to have two quite good solutions so that in case
> > one fails maybe the other works.
> >
> > > And we are definitely not interested in moving Ligature to Extragear.
> >
> > This sentence is so wrong...
> >
> > A) There is kpdf that is on kdegraphics in KDE 3.5. We rename it to
> > okular and put it on playground because all the other formats different
> > than PDF were not good enough. There is kviewshell that is on kdegraphics
> > in KDE 3.5. You rename it to Ligature and now claim that your project is
> > there and can not be replaced because "it was the first"? This is a quite
> > weak argument in my opinion.
> >
> > B) It is not you (nor me) who will decide if Ligature is going to be
> > shipped or not in kdegraphics in the case it is decided that only one of
> > the two programs can be on kdegraphics.
> >
> >
> >
> > To clarify, we just want to move okular to kdegraphics because lots of
> > people has been requesting it on IRC, my blog comments and personal
> > mails.
> >
> > Albert (KPDF mantainer and Okular team leader)
> >
> > > Greetings,
> > > Wilfried Huss (Ligature maintainer)
>
> Before this discussion gets really heated... may I suggest we table
> the request until the new TWG is formed?  Specifically, this issue
> falls under section "3.4 Reviewing applications" of the TWG charter,
> http://ev.kde.org/rules/twg_charter.php

Fine for me, but i really vote for having both applications in as stated 
above.

Albert
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]