From kde-core-devel  Tue Oct 24 01:57:10 2006
From: Clarence Dang <dang () kde ! org>
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 01:57:10 +0000
To: kde-core-devel
Subject: Re: [Fwd: Licensing Policy for non-code?]
Message-Id: <200610241157.12103.dang () kde ! org>
X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kde-core-devel&m=116165423020040

On Wednesday 18 October 2006 00:40, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> On Monday 16 October 2006 6:53, Clarence Dang wrote:
> > On Monday 16 October 2006 09:59, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
> > I personally think we should settle on a set of Creative Commons
> > licenses.
>
> once they are (with CCv3 afaik) compatible with the GPL, i agree.
> until then we're sort of stuck with the LGPL.

But why does it matter whether icons are GPL compatible?  You're never linking 
or deriving code from icons except for the tricky #include <x.xpm> case.

-- 
Clarence Dang

Blog - http://clarencedang.blogspot.com/
KolourPaint - http://www.kolourpaint.org/
Uni - http://www.cse.unsw.edu.au/~clarenced/