I was replying to Freidrich's (probably rhetorical, now that I think
about it) question, and I forgot to quote him. Sorry for the confusion
:(

On 10/19/06, Eike Hein <kde@eikehein.com> wrote:
> Branan Riley wrote:
> > Anyway, moving back to this thread, I think the big reason to stick
> > with pure Qt4 is that it works in KDE, MacOS, Windows, and even
> > embedded systems based on Qt. I think I read somewhere that there
> > would be an attempt to make KDE4 work on all platforms, but is that a
> > guarantee yet? Even if it is, KDE depends on Qt, so why use the extra
> > library layer if you don't have to?
>
> While it's certainly a technologically valid suggestion
> to go for Qt4-only if it's viable and reduces cross-de-
> pendencies in the platform, let's keep in mind that this
> is still kde-core-devel, not qt-addons-devel. I don't
> really see how the platform commitments kdelibs makes
> factors into the discussion in that context.
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Eike Hein, hein@kde.org
>