From kde-core-devel  Mon Oct 09 17:20:24 2006
From: "Aaron J. Seigo" <aseigo () kde ! org>
Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2006 17:20:24 +0000
To: kde-core-devel
Subject: Re: Using scripting languages for KDE4 main modules
Message-Id: <200610091120.25201.aseigo () kde ! org>
X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kde-core-devel&m=116041632700390
MIME-Version: 1
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="--nextPart10095359.0gV06Qo87R"

--nextPart10095359.0gV06Qo87R
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

On Sunday 08 October 2006 2:23, Alfredo Beaumont wrote:
> compared to what we want to offer with KOffice. Basic is not enough for
> that and we don't want to condemn our users (administrators) to that. As

oh, please don't misunderstand me: i'm certainly -not- suggesting basic sho=
uld=20
be used in koffice. *shudder* i was simply pointing out that real world=20
examples show that "simple", lightweight languages that are very=20
straightforward do the job well for the majority of people engaged in the u=
se=20
case of "making something for me and/or my company".

=2D-=20
Aaron J. Seigo
GPG Fingerprint: 8B8B 2209 0C6F 7C47 B1EA  EE75 D6B7 2EB1 A7F1 DB43

=46ull time KDE developer sponsored by Trolltech (http://www.trolltech.com)

--nextPart10095359.0gV06Qo87R
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBFKoTZ1rcusafx20MRAmVAAKCkUO9sSV935/W1oG7BMlqfUHT61ACgk6ez
PFTFmkkH2+tL8m+GFtX70qo=
=5xzl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart10095359.0gV06Qo87R--