On 10/7/06, Aaron J. Seigo <aseigo@kde.org> wrote:
> On Saturday 07 October 2006 12:39, Cyrille Berger wrote:
> > The reallity why JavaScript (and an hypothetic Basic interpreter) aren't
> > sufficient for KOffice compared to ruby and python, is that neither of them
>
> which, of course, flies in the face of the use of basic in microsoft's office
> products. it may not be pretty to our (developer) standards, but it works and
> a lot of people love it (sadly ;)
Let's remember that the GUI of Mozilla is based purely on Javascript,
so I assume it is a viable alternatives to the other two.

regards,
Cougar
-- 
http://liucougar.scim-im.org
"People's characters are strengthened through struggle against
difficulties; they are weakened by comfort."
- Old Chinese adage