From kde-core-devel  Tue Oct 03 20:53:54 2006
From: Michael Pyne <michael.pyne () kdemail ! net>
Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2006 20:53:54 +0000
To: kde-core-devel
Subject: Re: Using scripting languages for KDE4 main modules
Message-Id: <200610031654.01873.michael.pyne () kdemail ! net>
X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kde-core-devel&m=115990886519993
MIME-Version: 1
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="--nextPart1965076.IDrjoLDnXQ"

--nextPart1965076.IDrjoLDnXQ
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

On Tuesday 03 October 2006 16:46, Guillaume Laurent wrote:
> On Tuesday 03 October 2006 18:34, Gary L. Greene Jr. wrote:
> > Personally, I think this idea of selecting an "official" application
> > scripting language is a bad idea, as that again raises the bar for new
> > developers.
>
> See Coolo's message on the matter. Maintaining multiple bindings is not an
> option.

Sure it is, but I don't think it's an option for an applications that are t=
o=20
be distributed ('blessed') by KDE.

Regards,
 - Michael Pyne

--nextPart1965076.IDrjoLDnXQ
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBFIs3pqjQYp5Omm0oRAqpEAJ9Y+X6JtPOwdE5bf85uQ7G8c+YrlACggboi
qLnJkQJSIjlXAHgQ+hgoCk4=
=NgR1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart1965076.IDrjoLDnXQ--