From kde-core-devel  Tue Oct 03 17:57:12 2006
From: "Gary L. Greene Jr." <greeneg () phoenuxos ! com>
Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2006 17:57:12 +0000
To: kde-core-devel
Subject: Re: Using scripting languages for KDE4 main modules
Message-Id: <200610031357.15259.greeneg () phoenuxos ! com>
X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kde-core-devel&m=115989825916084
MIME-Version: 1
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="--nextPart1331780.K70Zo91KSV"

--nextPart1331780.K70Zo91KSV
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

On Tuesday 03 October 2006 13:51, Matt Newell wrote:
> On Tuesday 03 October 2006 06:58, Richard_Dale@tipitina.demon.co.uk wrote:
> > On Tuesday 03 October 2006 14:29, Luciano Montanaro wrote:
> > > On Sunday 01 October 2006 20:40, Stephen Leaf wrote:
> > > > On Sunday 01 October 2006 7:31 am, Guillaume Laurent wrote:
> > > > > On Sunday 01 October 2006 13:00, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> > > > > > I don't think it would be possible to reach a consensus on this
> > > > > > one: python <-> ruby <-> java <-> c# ...
> > > > >
> > > > > We want a script language, so Java and C# are out of consideratio=
n,
> > > > > the added value compared to C++ just isn't worth it. So it's
> > > > > between Python and Ruby (at least we all agree that Perl is a no-=
go
> > > > > :-) ).
> > > >
> > > > not everyone, I hate the python syntax. And as for ruby syntax?..
> > > > I've seen scribbles that were more readable. Maybe it was just the
> > > > examples on the official page I dunno but it just churned my stomac=
h.
> > > > I personally prefer Perl out of those 3 choices.
> > >
> > > What is the state of Perl bindings?
> >
> > There is no work going into the Qt4 version of PerlQt, although it
> > wouln't take a huge amount of effort to adapt the Qt4 QtRuby bindings.
>
> I have the old perlqt bindings working for qt4.  Signals and slots work,
> but only a small portion of the classes are wrapped, and all the
> auto-figure-out-what-features-your-qt-has is ripped out.  So it would sti=
ll
> require a lot of work to get them up to release quality, and I HATE perl,
> so I'm not going to work on them.
>
> But if there is interest i will send a tarball that could really get
> someone started.  Btw, i have them building on windows too with only ming=
w,
> perl, and qt as dependancies.
>
> Matt

PLEASE :) I'd like to get that tarball as I just told Richard that I'm=20
interested in working on getting the Qt/KDE bindings for Qt4 and Perl up to=
=20
par for us Perl hackers.

--nextPart1331780.K70Zo91KSV
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.9.20 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBFIqR7CkngzK11zHsRAjpwAJ4ikQY3zEv8qHrqT+LRL7Q1SIbiQwCfZaTa
XQphEKRH8rRFOOg/lBHl5mw=
=/6oS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart1331780.K70Zo91KSV--