--nextPart19344990.sUQW4RnpEk
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

On Sunday 01 October 2006 12:57, Guillaume Laurent wrote:

> Yes, but for non-basic apps which can be written in a scripting language,
> it's better if they are all written in the same one, so we can limit both
> memory usage and dependencies to a single binding.

In an ideal world, yes, perhaps. But we don't have that luxury: I much pref=
er=20
having the necessary applications written at all to not having them written=
=20
because the person who has time & inclination to do something cannot stomac=
h=20
JavaScript.

There is a large class of applications for which it is silly to use anythin=
g=20
as time consuming as C++: that class includes all applications that can mak=
e=20
do with standard widgets, that don't have to do complex painting.

=2D-=20
Boudewijn Rempt=20
http://www.valdyas.org/fading/index.cgi

--nextPart19344990.sUQW4RnpEk
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBFH6JUdaCcgCmN5d8RAj6kAKDPcUl38bpAPdzoEOcTdIlBeKi8gQCfZ7Lh
qhRR5fbdo5T8abNXEEScy7w=
=P0ec
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart19344990.sUQW4RnpEk--