Dirk Mueller wrote:
> On Wednesday 13 September 2006 16:56, David Faure wrote:
>
>   
>> , you are only saying that we are not using them right now (so of 
>> course QT_NO_STL changes nothing). You imply that with stl algorithms it
>> would be worse, but this is no proof, it might well be better when used
>> properly.
>>     
>
> I've yet to see a single real world application that uses it properly. 
>   
If by 'it' you mean 'the STL', then I think Rosegarden qualifies.

-- 
Guillaume
http://telegraph-road.org