On Monday, 4. September 2006 17:02, Lubos Lunak wrote:

>  Yeah, I know. The point is, my fonts look perfectly fine here even with
> the real DPI (unless there's something wrong with my eyes or I've gotten so
> used to bad fonts). And, of course, the technical problems pointed out by
> Germain. It kinda makes me feel insane for trying to push in a feature that
> nobody should use.

Well, it does make sense to me to round to the nearest xdpi of the set 
(96,128,>144) instead of using a random xdpi. For example, my display at work 
has a physical resolution of 98dpi, and I tested, fonts *do* look better with 
96dpi. 


Dirk