From kde-core-devel  Mon Sep 04 00:11:54 2006
From: Thiago Macieira <thiago () kde ! org>
Date: Mon, 04 Sep 2006 00:11:54 +0000
To: kde-core-devel
Subject: Re: RFC: KToolBox
Message-Id: <200609040212.02760.thiago () kde ! org>
X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kde-core-devel&m=115732879411144
MIME-Version: 1
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="--nextPart1378740.u5Y8L1rR18"

--nextPart1378740.u5Y8L1rR18
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

Matt Broadstone wrote:
>As for the QPL stuff, can someone speak to that? Is it enough to throw
>a GPL license on it as opposed to the LGPL I threw on at the last
>minute.. I'm not really interested in =A0personal ownership of the code
>as much as I am getting it out there and useable and I am somewhat
>unfamiliar with what is possible under the GPL (I read it a little bit
>earlier but couldn't get a clear picture of what happens in this
>case).

If you copied the code from Qt, then it has to be GPL (not LGPL) and=20
cannot be in kdelibs. Pretty much everyone agrees that QPL is dead, so=20
let's not disturb it.

If you wrote the code, then you choose.

=2D-=20
=A0 Thiago Macieira =A0- =A0thiago (AT) macieira.info - thiago (AT) kde.org
=A0 =A0 PGP/GPG: 0x6EF45358; fingerprint:
=A0 =A0 E067 918B B660 DBD1 105C =A0966C 33F5 F005 6EF4 5358

--nextPart1378740.u5Y8L1rR18
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBE+29SM/XwBW70U1gRArNIAJ9pxM13eWZ3hENqTTWQDPILe4faXwCgvLm4
UL9IYIFS+zSmKknw58WXAFo=
=iDao
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart1378740.u5Y8L1rR18--