From kde-core-devel  Thu Aug 03 12:10:41 2006
From: Kevin Krammer <kevin.krammer () gmx ! at>
Date: Thu, 03 Aug 2006 12:10:41 +0000
To: kde-core-devel
Subject: Re: OOM-killer prevention for master kdeinit process
Message-Id: <200608031410.46153.kevin.krammer () gmx ! at>
X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kde-core-devel&m=115460708031184
MIME-Version: 1
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="--nextPart1383028.GiOjUBJE3e"

--nextPart1383028.GiOjUBJE3e
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

On Thursday 03 August 2006 13:51, Lubos Lunak wrote:
> On Thursday 03 August 2006 13:11, Kevin Krammer wrote:
> > On Thursday 03 August 2006 11:52, Lubos Lunak wrote:
> > > set to normal. Also, some unwanted launching of something from kdeinit
> > > with the adjustment inherited (even though I don't quite see how that
> > > could happen in practice) would just at worst result in a process that
> > > wouldn't get killed by the OOM-killer in the unlikely case it
> > > misbehaves, causing
> >
> > kded misbehaving is quite common, not due to its own fault but due to
> > faulty modules. Same situation for kicker and memory leaking applets
>
>  "unwanted launching" - kdeinit launches kded very much on purpose and can
> drop the adjustment after the fork before the child becomes kded.

Oh, I missed that part, sorry :)

Cheers,
Kevin

=2D-=20
Kevin Krammer <kevin.krammer@gmx.at>
Qt/KDE Developer, Debian User
Moderator: www.mrunix.de (German), www.qtcentre.org

--nextPart1383028.GiOjUBJE3e
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBE0efGnKMhG6pzZJIRAvt8AJ9f0XAvZQ9qptEgTnMnA046Sk6sgwCeNZN9
nEuaoNojlnBU38xPN7hjvaY=
=SYtb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart1383028.GiOjUBJE3e--