Aaron J. Seigo wrote, on Thursday 2006 July 20 11:44 am:
> if we try and make a little adjustment here and a little adjustment there
> we'll just end up bikeshedding on the issue and we'll never get a common
> style. so we've taken the style used in Qt and adopted that verbatim[1] so
> as to avoid all that. ergo:

Well, you didn't use random indentation and instead are doing 4-spaces. If you 
can do 4-spaces which everyone agrees is better than Qt's random style, than 
we can surely do curly-brace-on-the-next line as well, as most of us agree 
that's a good thing.

Charles