[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-core-devel
Subject:    Re: Pimpl copying
From:       Olivier Goffart <ogoffart () kde ! org>
Date:       2006-07-15 8:08:56
Message-ID: 200607151009.02256.ogoffart () kde ! org
[Download RAW message or body]


Le vendredi 14 juillet 2006 20:38, Aaron J. Seigo a écrit :
> On Friday 14 July 2006 11:35, Peter Kümmel wrote:
> > Searching for "Private;" shows that the naming is totally inconsistent
> > in kdelibs. So the question is, must it be consistent? And if, which
> > name should be used?
>
> yes, it should be consistent. no, i don't think we should spend time
> discussing it on this list. there are people who feel one way, others who
> feel another ... it's almost purely personal aesthetic opinion. and
> opinions can (and will) be discussed (or argued) forever without
> resolution.

Althought my personal preferences goes to KFoo::Private, a technical reason 
has been mentioned against it:
The fact that KFoo::Private is exported with KFoo if KFoo has the KDE_EXPORT 
macro.

Anyway, this information need to be verified.


[Attachment #3 (application/pgp-signature)]

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]