From kde-core-devel  Fri Jul 14 13:34:22 2006
From: Simon Hausmann <hausmann () kde ! org>
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 13:34:22 +0000
To: kde-core-devel
Subject: Re: Trolltech <-> KDE contact point for critical issues
Message-Id: <200607141534.25141.hausmann () kde ! org>
X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kde-core-devel&m=115288416806190
MIME-Version: 1
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="--nextPart2575695.9Ggqu5Jxdq"

--nextPart2575695.9Ggqu5Jxdq
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

On Friday 14 July 2006 14:30, Peter K=FCmmel wrote:
> Simon Hausmann wrote:
> > We would like to hear about issues and (missing) features in Qt 4 that
> > are critical to the release of KDE 4.0. Getting the Qt dbus bindings
> > working on Windows is a good example for that. (and thanks Peter for
> > investigating, btw)
>
> It's not critical to KDE because it's already in kdelibs, but why not
> move KLockFile and KTemp* to Qt? Does this not complete the file handling
> provided by Qt?

I couldn't agree more :)

It's not critical for KDE (so it's no Qt 4.2 material), it would be a very=
=20
nice feature to have and it surely would add to the file handling.

We of course couldn't just take KLockFile directly (think licensing, copyri=
ght=20
assignment, etc.), but then Qt already has somewhat of a lock file=20
implementation internally in QSettings.

Simon

--nextPart2575695.9Ggqu5Jxdq
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBEt51hWXvMThJCpvIRAoAJAKCIMKZfiBKaqRhNr3zWiR+df2Mb7gCgplKY
LLDgCEPmnBFQ4xMp1+aH79s=
=Ya2c
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart2575695.9Ggqu5Jxdq--