From kde-core-devel  Fri Jul 07 12:23:11 2006
From: Chusslove Illich <caslav.ilic () gmx ! net>
Date: Fri, 07 Jul 2006 12:23:11 +0000
To: kde-core-devel
Subject: Re: modifier-only shortcuts
Message-Id: <200607071423.12442.caslav.ilic () gmx ! net>
X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kde-core-devel&m=115227517005620
MIME-Version: 1
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="--nextPart1635755.4coYPUfiEh"

--nextPart1635755.4coYPUfiEh
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

> [: Thomas Zander :]
> Sorry, I was thinking Qt4 already; where the keyboard combination is=20
> mapped to a key and not a glyph. [...] lack of this=20
> functionality not only on Qt3, but on a lot more systems.

I didn't know that, it's excellent news.

> That solution is, naturally, the real solution to this mess [...]

I disagree that anything more than standing-out two-key shortcut is=20
appropriate for layout switching, but it is indeed solution to general=20
shortcut mess for non-Latin users.

Just for further clarification, which shortcuts are *not* going to be=20
physical? I guess only Alt+something, or not?

Thinking of Latin users, though, I must wonder what will happen to current=
=20
practice? Eg. Ctrl+Z is bottom row in en_US, and top row in de layout, and=
=20
users are used to that.

=2D-=20
Chusslove Illich (=D0=A7=D0=B0=D1=81=D0=BB=D0=B0=D0=B2 =D0=98=D0=BB=D0=B8=
=D1=9B)

--nextPart1635755.4coYPUfiEh
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBErlIwMSGXgigGr3ERAgGvAJ9a6RHnOgWQWVuGF0e4apwufJ7HqwCdEP1n
Iv27RH9a3Dx1tJmdL2/JZGw=
=eg3i
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart1635755.4coYPUfiEh--