--nextPart2634684.XLB8ND2Hcx
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

Le mercredi 28 juin 2006 09:34, Thomas Zander a =E9crit=A0:
> On Wednesday 28 June 2006 00:20, Olivier Goffart wrote:
> > It has been suggested to backports only parts of Kopete 0.12
> > I am personally against this because it will be difficult to extract
> > part. and this will not make it =A0easy for maintenance.
>
> Whats wrong with going through the commit list and backporting all
> bugfixes?
> This is a standard problem with branches and backporting regularly (every
> time one makes a commit, or ones a week) is recommended, even standard
> practice.  Why didn't kopete devels do so?

Because 0.12 is a branch for new feature.
But many bugfixes have already been backported

--nextPart2634684.XLB8ND2Hcx
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBEojWrz58lY8jWrL0RAsfZAKCIqxcV7litEvIKEjxhLhcDLVok9gCghH/5
bLJI+xqedOUfYjCMeP52MVo=
=8WgT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart2634684.XLB8ND2Hcx--