From kde-core-devel  Wed Jun 28 07:34:09 2006
From: Thomas Zander <zander () kde ! org>
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 07:34:09 +0000
To: kde-core-devel
Subject: Re: Feature:  Kopete 0.12
Message-Id: <200606280934.14658.zander () kde ! org>
X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kde-core-devel&m=115148012905909
MIME-Version: 1
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="--nextPart1784037.I75pSnMAiY"

--nextPart1784037.I75pSnMAiY
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-15"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

On Wednesday 28 June 2006 00:20, Olivier Goffart wrote:
> It has been suggested to backports only parts of Kopete 0.12
> I am personally against this because it will be difficult to extract
> part. and this will not make it =A0easy for maintenance.

Whats wrong with going through the commit list and backporting all=20
bugfixes?
This is a standard problem with branches and backporting regularly (every=20
time one makes a commit, or ones a week) is recommended, even standard=20
practice.  Why didn't kopete devels do so?

=2D-=20
Thomas Zander

--nextPart1784037.I75pSnMAiY
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBEojD2CojCW6H2z/QRAkQkAJ4tZ8NBgcsQAHvSQI52+nl1jcuazACeIM6p
1NuyVcRVazPcIHVUkqavxgA=
=ro9J
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart1784037.I75pSnMAiY--