[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-core-devel
Subject:    Re: 0 or 0L for empty pointers?
From:       Scott Wheeler <wheeler () kde ! org>
Date:       2006-06-23 12:55:21
Message-ID: 200606231455.21219.wheeler () kde ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

On Friday 23 June 2006 14:18, Frans Englich wrote:
> You mean separating the implementation? To put the implementation for a
> member in a template class outside the class definition? That seems to work
> just fine with a couple of gcc versions.

It was a joke -- the C++ spec allows for template definitions to be in a 
different compilation unit, but pretty much no compiler supports that.

-Scott

-- 
diff -u life.cpp~ life.cpp
--- life.cpp~   2002/03/19 07:44:28
+++ life.cpp   2002/04/09 15:49:39
-#include <sleep.h>
+#include <caffeine.h>
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]