[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-core-devel
Subject:    Re: Standalone qt-dbus in kdesupport
From:       David Faure <faure () kde ! org>
Date:       2006-06-08 11:23:44
Message-ID: 200606081323.44833.faure () kde ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

On Thursday 08 June 2006 13:14, Paulo Jorge Guedes wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: David Faure [mailto:faure@kde.org]
> > Sent: quinta-feira, 8 de Junho de 2006 12:08
> > To: kde-core-devel@kde.org
> > Subject: Re: Standalone qt-dbus in kdesupport
> > 
> > On Thursday 08 June 2006 12:15, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > > Paulo Jorge Guedes wrote:
> > > >So, what do you think of
> > > >
> > > >--- CMakeLists.txt    (revision 549165)
> > > >+++ CMakeLists.txt    (working copy)
> > > >@@ -1 +0,0 @@
> > > >-ADD_SUBDIRECTORY( qt-dbus )
> > >
> > > Huh? Why do you want to disable qt-dbus builds?
> > 
> > No he wants people to run cmake from within qt-dbus instead of doing
> it
> > for the whole of kdesupport in one go.
> > 
> > As long as kdesvn-build supports it, I don't mind too much
> > (right now I install kdesupport into its own prefix, which is a bit
> > strange
> > since it's a collection of unrelated things).
> 
> Precisely. 
> People can always do cmake ..\kdesupport\qt-dbus in some qt-dbus build
> directory but IMHO it would be better if they were forced to (just like
> people build kdewin32) because, like David said, it's a collection of
> unrelated things.

But if both are possible in the current situation, then I don't see the point in forcing
anything upon people...

-- 
David Faure, faure@kde.org, sponsored by Trolltech to work on KDE,
Konqueror (http://www.konqueror.org), and KOffice (http://www.koffice.org).

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]