On Jun 2, 2006, at 12:55 PM, Randy Kramer wrote:

> On Thursday 01 June 2006 09:49 pm, Kenneth Wimer wrote:
>> Secondly, this seems to reflect the idea on the first page again,  
>> which we
>> *do* agree with but the next paragraph simply does not belong in a  
>> spec as
>> it adds artistsical value and human judgement thereof as well as a  
>> bit of
>> bullshit.
>>
>> "It is recommended that the icons installed in the hicolor theme look
>> neutral, since it is a fallback theme that will be used in  
>> combination with
>> some very different looking themes."
>
> (from the peanut gallery, and off the main point of the post)  I  
> disagree that
> the cited paragraph does not belong in a spec.  If such a paragraph is
> present (one which requires clarification or human judgment) it  
> requires
> communication with whoever is responsible for the spec.
>

So you are saying that we should let those who made the spec judge  
the artistic value of the icons? I seriously do not understand your  
point.

Confused,
Ken