[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: kde-core-devel
Subject: Re: is new lib dependency possible for 3.5.2?
From: Michael Pyne <michael.pyne () kdemail ! net>
Date: 2006-01-29 21:48:47
Message-ID: 200601291648.47443.michael.pyne () kdemail ! net
[Download RAW message or body]
On Sunday 29 January 2006 14:31, Leo Savernik wrote:
> Am Samstag, 28. Januar 2006 02:10 schrieb Matt Rogers:
> > On Friday 27 January 2006 11:05, Leo Savernik wrote:
> > > Am Freitag, 27. Januar 2006 14:49 schrieb Andriy Rysin:
> > > > libxklavier is used in GNOME
> > >
> > > Does it depend on glib?
> > >
> > > mfg
> > > Leo
> >
> > why does this even matter?
>
> Ever asked on gnome-devel-list to introduce a dependency on QtCore?
Ah, so this is a tit-for-tat arrangement?
"You depend on our library and we'll depend on 2 of yours."
It was almost be a nice argument except that, for whatever reason those
Kuh-raaaazay GNOME guys have decided that they want their base libs coded in
C. I'm sure you already know how difficult it can be to use C++ code with no
C bindings from C.
On the other hand, using C code from C++ is often merely annoying, and can
sometimes even be just a slight chore with a few decent C++ wrappers of C
classes.
In other words, it is easier for us to depend on a C library than it is for
them to depend on a C++ library.
And besides, QtCore does so much just by itself that we'd really have to
depend on about half of GNOME's libs to make it a tit-for-tat arrangement if
they were to depend on QtCore.
Regards,
- Michael Pyne
[Attachment #3 (application/pgp-signature)]
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic