[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-core-devel
Subject:    Re: RFC: kdDebug() -> kDebug()
From:       Gregory Hayes <syncomm () gmail ! com>
Date:       2006-01-28 15:29:16
Message-ID: 9f573ec50601280729w29c1b725jbfda8fde5621b1a4 () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

Good idea. Ditto on kdWarning()

On 1/28/06, Stephan Kulow <coolo@kde.org> wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> I would like to remove some stupidness from our API: the d between k
> and Debug() and wonder what others feel about it taking that it will
> require
> some changes in the code :)
>
> The reason it's there is that kDebug() was already taken by a function
> basically replacing qDebug() - but as this function is gone, I'd like to
> change that for KDE4. What do you think?
>
> Greetings, Stephan
>

[Attachment #3 (text/html)]

Good idea. Ditto on kdWarning()<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 1/28/06, <b \
class="gmail_sendername">Stephan Kulow</b> &lt;<a \
href="mailto:coolo@kde.org">coolo@kde.org</a>&gt; wrote:</span><blockquote \
class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt \
0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> Hi!<br><br>I would like to remove some stupidness \
from our API: the d between k<br>and Debug() and wonder what others feel about it \
taking that it will require<br>some changes in the code :)<br><br>The reason it's \
there is that kDebug() was already taken by a function <br>basically replacing \
qDebug() - but as this function is gone, I'd like to<br>change that for KDE4. What do \
you think?<br><br>Greetings, Stephan<br></blockquote></div><br>



[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]