From kde-core-devel  Sun Jan 15 06:43:40 2006
From: Michael Pyne <michael.pyne () kdemail ! net>
Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2006 06:43:40 +0000
To: kde-core-devel
Subject: Re: KSharedPtr changes
Message-Id: <200601150143.41063.michael.pyne () kdemail ! net>
X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kde-core-devel&m=113730704718938
MIME-Version: 1
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="--nextPart6657987.X2MxNsJAqY"

--nextPart6657987.X2MxNsJAqY
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

On Sunday 15 January 2006 01:38, Michael Pyne wrote:
> > It's worth this little inconvenience. The dangling pointer from Michel's
> > example is much more anoying.
>
> Have you guys actually tested that?  Unless I'm mistaken, in C++, *when
> constructing an object*, the Foo foo =3D bar; and Foo foo(bar); syntaxes =
are
> identical and equivalent.
>
> I'll make up some test code and report back.

Well, it works sometimes, but not with explicit constructors.  So yes, the=
=20
syntax change would be required.

Regards,
 - Michael Pyne

--nextPart6657987.X2MxNsJAqY
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBDye8dqjQYp5Omm0oRApuHAKCMU+yMwHd9ki7VJ1YhrkLr+BRyagCeM9H9
77r5SbNF7TL7W/zjWGZnXQA=
=fGr8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart6657987.X2MxNsJAqY--