From kde-core-devel  Sun Jan 15 06:38:21 2006
From: Michael Pyne <michael.pyne () kdemail ! net>
Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2006 06:38:21 +0000
To: kde-core-devel
Subject: Re: KSharedPtr changes
Message-Id: <200601150138.21222.michael.pyne () kdemail ! net>
X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kde-core-devel&m=113730669820797
MIME-Version: 1
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="--nextPart2923239.09Zu8SeRtB"

--nextPart2923239.09Zu8SeRtB
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-15"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

On Saturday 14 January 2006 08:05, Andr=E9 W=F6bbeking wrote:
> On Saturday 14 January 2006 13:06, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> > On Saturday 14 January 2006 12:54, Michel Hermier wrote:
> > > One main disaventage of that is that we can't use the
> > > "KSharedPtr<Foo> foo =3D bar;" syntax.
> > > We must use the "KSharedPtr<Foo> foo(bar);" syntax.
> >
> > I'd hate that... We use this construction in so many places in Krita
> > that it's going to be decided unfun to convert it everywhere.
>
> It's worth this little inconvenience. The dangling pointer from Michel's
> example is much more anoying.

Have you guys actually tested that?  Unless I'm mistaken, in C++, *when=20
constructing an object*, the Foo foo =3D bar; and Foo foo(bar); syntaxes ar=
e=20
identical and equivalent.

I'll make up some test code and report back.

Regards,
 - Michael Pyne

--nextPart2923239.09Zu8SeRtB
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBDye3dqjQYp5Omm0oRApYqAKCFTGTwszBaMvanIAfFJUt1ZrQazgCfb5ne
gsEi5EuZ9FEQ9FBX4/a4F30=
=TvQB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart2923239.09Zu8SeRtB--