On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 11:42:17AM +0100, Lubos Lunak wrote:
> On Thursday 12 January 2006 00:11, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > Lubos Lunak wrote:
> > >Dne st??eda 11 leden 2006 21:03 Oswald Buddenhagen napsal(a):
> > >> On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 05:40:43PM +0100, Lubos Lunak wrote:
> > >> > This way KCrash should be more reliable and we should (hopefully)
> > >> > always get DrKonqi now.
> > >>
> > >> have you tried crashing the kdm greeter?
> 
>  Well, AFAICS it's the same - nothing happens in either case.
>
damn

> Is KCrash disabled there?
> 
no. it seems highly unreliable, though. i have no idea what the problem is.

-- 
Hi! I'm a .signature virus! Copy me into your ~/.signature, please!
--
Chaos, panic, and disorder - my work here is done.