From kde-core-devel Thu Jan 12 15:46:12 2006 From: Oswald Buddenhagen Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 15:46:12 +0000 To: kde-core-devel Subject: Re: More crash-proof KCrash (was Re: Konq crash backtraces) Message-Id: <20060112154612.GB15922 () ugly ! local> X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kde-core-devel&m=113708090020044 On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 11:42:17AM +0100, Lubos Lunak wrote: > On Thursday 12 January 2006 00:11, Thiago Macieira wrote: > > Lubos Lunak wrote: > > >Dne st??eda 11 leden 2006 21:03 Oswald Buddenhagen napsal(a): > > >> On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 05:40:43PM +0100, Lubos Lunak wrote: > > >> > This way KCrash should be more reliable and we should (hopefully) > > >> > always get DrKonqi now. > > >> > > >> have you tried crashing the kdm greeter? > > Well, AFAICS it's the same - nothing happens in either case. > damn > Is KCrash disabled there? > no. it seems highly unreliable, though. i have no idea what the problem is. -- Hi! I'm a .signature virus! Copy me into your ~/.signature, please! -- Chaos, panic, and disorder - my work here is done.