On 1/10/06, George Staikos wrote: > On Tuesday 10 January 2006 17:27, Koos Vriezen wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 05:24:22PM -0500, George Staikos wrote: > > > On Tuesday 10 January 2006 17:18, Koos Vriezen wrote: > > > > I'm convinced, where can I order two copies :) > > > > > > > > Seriously, since I've added KJS CPU guard, what will be the > > > > replacement? > > > > > > I don't know yet. > > > > Any idea how Safari solves this? (I hope we all agree that a script > > never may hang konqueror) > > It doesn't presently, as far as I know. > > > > > Also, what happens with the js <-> plugin interface, will that remain > > > > or should plugins add kjs (like I posted some time ago) or what happens > > > > there? > > > > > > Another open issue. I don't have the answers yet. > > > > Likewise here? > > Same as above. Just don't know. We'll deal with it though. > > -- > George Staikos > KDE Developer http://www.kde.org/ > Staikos Computing Services Inc. http://www.staikos.net/ > I've merged Ian's KJSEmbed into branches/work/kde4/playground/bindings for the time being. I hope to get working with him this week getting it to build using the new KJS, but I agree that it should probably be moved to kdelibs as it will at least become a big part of Plasma relatively soon.