--nextPart3058930.sXlBjH5IFj
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

On Wednesday 04 January 2006 11:08, Maks Orlovich wrote:
> >  * one for GCC 3.4/4.0 ABI
> >
> > In theory, the latter two should be identical (they both try to impleme=
nt
> > the Itanium C++ ABI specification (go to
> > http://www.codesourcery.com/cxx-abi/ for a full documentation).
>
> In practice, even with identical versions of GCC, you'd find that many
> Linux distributions break the libstdc++ ABI.

Please be specific. Which distribution did break the ABI when and with whic=
h=20
version of GCC? Vague statements like the one above tend to get repeated an=
d=20
gain alife of their own without any way to evaluate their truth.

Cheers,
Waldo

--nextPart3058930.sXlBjH5IFj
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBDvGMGN4pvrENfboIRAv/WAKCLLWVbYBtWs2Pb//g9kw7lbJt8HwCfbDiH
SAekcFeWpAZDR2Jk/LymJvY=
=5xDy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart3058930.sXlBjH5IFj--