[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: kde-core-devel
Subject: Re: Custom URI schemes & KDE
From: David Faure <faure () kde ! org>
Date: 2006-01-02 15:49:18
Message-ID: 200601021649.19161.faure () kde ! org
[Download RAW message or body]
On Monday 02 January 2006 15:34, Frans Englich wrote:
> Here's how the discussion can be summed up so far:
* You make up a policy to solve a problem that doesn't exist
You haven't answered my question: ok, so kmymoney defined *internally* a protocol
named sql, and you find that dirty. So? Did any actual bug result from it, or could have
resulted from it? I still lack a description of the problem that you're trying to fix.
> And I ask what I did previously: what is your point?
Un-necessary complication.
> I want to get somewhere: clear objections to why the document should not end
> up on DKO, or suggestion on changes.
The objection is clear IMHO: this is un-necessary complication since it doesn't
solve any practical problem.
If it does, then the document isn't clear enough about that.
> Because specific KIO examples doesn't interest me much; we can switch to
> examples in more XML-hardcore applications. And the DOM 3 Core DOMError
> example still stands, btw.
I lack context to understand that one.
--
David Faure, faure@kde.org, sponsored by Trolltech to work on KDE,
Konqueror (http://www.konqueror.org), and KOffice (http://www.koffice.org).
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic