[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: kde-core-devel
Subject: Re: kconfig_compiler4
From: Nicolas Goutte <nicolasg () snafu ! de>
Date: 2005-12-28 17:26:40
Message-ID: 200512281826.40995.nicolasg () snafu ! de
[Download RAW message or body]
On Wednesday 28 December 2005 18:07, Allen Winter wrote:
> On Monday 26 December 2005 14:32, Thomas Braxton wrote:
> > On Saturday 24 December 2005 08:15, Allen Winter wrote:
> > > Can you explain why the change? kconfig_compiler already supported
> > > Int64 and UInt64 types so I don't understand the need for eliminating
> > > Int/UInt types. I think *adding* support for Int32/UInt32 may make
> > > some sense, but removing Int/UInt doesn't seem necessary, nor optimal.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Allen
(...)
> I'm not sure why we should be specifying the number of bits of a
> configuration type.
Because it is the only sane way to store data in a machine-independant type
(without using text)?
>
> Int types should eventually convert into the machine wordsize and Long
> types to the biggest integer you can get on the machine (which might be
> long long on some systems).
>
> My 2cents,
> Allen
Have a nice day!
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic