[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-core-devel
Subject:    Re: XSETTINGS spec
From:       Martin Konold <martin.konold () erfrakon ! de>
Date:       2005-12-11 23:37:25
Message-ID: 200512120037.26857.martin.konold () erfrakon ! de
[Download RAW message or body]

Am Montag, 12. Dezember 2005 00:11 schrieb Lubos Lunak:

Hi,

>  Zack apparently felt (and he was).

Yes, thanks for hinting me!

>  It can. The spec says a process, not a separate process, in fact it
> explicitly says it doesn't have to be a separate process. In KDE's case it
> could very well be yet another kded module.

ok, this is no issue then anymore.

> > In addition I also don't like the fact that it is tight to X11. IMHO new
> > cross desktop stuff shall not depend on X if there is not a very
> > compelling reason for this. IMHO simple exchange of strings is no good
> > reason for depending on X.
>
>  And the magic solution is?

I have not final opinion about it but why using X at all for this? Why cant it 
be handled by some DBUS stuff?

Yours,
-- martin

-- 
http://www.erfrakon.com/
Erlewein, Frank, Konold & Partner - Beratende Ingenieure und Physiker

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]