On 11/20/05, Olivier Goffart <ogoffart@kde.org> wrote:
But this is to respect the "complicated-passive-popup spec"
 
This spec only offers a subset of the flexibility I put in the KPassivePopup API - for example, a KPassivePopup can be a 'passive dialog' when the API is used directly rather than via KNoitfy (it can contain arbitrary widgets). Is the idea that these should all be handled by the daemon?
 
Cheers
 
Rich.