--nextPart1362940.3dNupOohuW
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

Le Mardi 8 Novembre 2005 11:14, Stephan Binner a =E9crit=A0:

> User levels don't work, see previous discussions. Citing such reports as
> argumentation for it is poor and doesn't change this fact.

Each time someone suggest that, here or on kde-usability, there is someone =
to=20
say "it's bad, see previous discussions" and that's all

But what are the "previous discussion" you are referring to,  have you a li=
nk=20
or something that could let me know.

=46irst, "user levels"  should be defined.
 1) is it different UI depending the level ?
 2) different default option depending the level ?
 3) putting all avanced option in an advanced tab ?
 4) or removing all the option to put them in another hiden application
     (KTweekUI / GConfEditor / RegEdit )

I think that it has been said, on "previous discussion" that #1 is bad, =20
because it doesn't let the user the change to evoluate progressively.

=46or the same reason, i think #4 is bad too, and even, the setting is more=
=20
difficult to find, outside of the application.

But the #2 (which is, if i understand correctly, what has been suggested in=
=20
the original post)  looks verry fine

Personaly, i like the #2,  but i am strongly against #4


--nextPart1362940.3dNupOohuW
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBDccFtz58lY8jWrL0RAtuWAJ92w9XcUny8fX9TxA3Xaqwmi8+G7QCdEUL1
566/y//xf4ZciFZBodl6Vj0=
=zHNx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart1362940.3dNupOohuW--