[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-core-devel
Subject:    Re: Qt4 constructors
From:       Benjamin Meyer <icefox () gmail ! com>
Date:       2005-09-09 11:24:15
Message-ID: 43d4675505090904243cda7521 () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

I have noticed that parts of kdelibs have already been converted.  Not
to continue this thread forever, but is this (at least somewhat) ok
with everyone?

On 9/6/05, Kuba Ober <kuba@mareimbrium.org> wrote:
> On Tuesday 06 September 2005 06:45, Harri Porten wrote:
> > On Tue, 6 Sep 2005, Benjamin Meyer wrote:
> > > yes, setObjectName() is a lot nicer in that regard.  Reading the code
> > > you know exactly what it is doing rather then questioning if it is the
> > > caption, text or object name.
> >
> > The problem is that setObjectName() will hardly get used. And for testing
> > and scripting the lack of unique object names is really bad. 
> 
> Sure. But that doesn't imply that mere presence of an argument suddenly
> makes 
> it used or useful.
> 
> Cheers, Kuba
>

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]