From kde-core-devel  Mon Aug 29 09:19:42 2005
From: Andras Mantia <amantia () kde ! org>
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2005 09:19:42 +0000
To: kde-core-devel
Subject: Re: Redefining kdelibs and kdebase
Message-Id: <200508291219.42834.amantia () kde ! org>
X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kde-core-devel&m=112531154127025
MIME-Version: 1
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="--nextPart1558323.EmeqVII5RD"

--nextPart1558323.EmeqVII5RD
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

On Sunday 28 August 2005 23:31, Ingo Kl=C3=B6cker wrote:
> This
> inconsistency will obviously make the migration from Windows to
> Unix/Linux harder instead of making it easier because the users will
> have to be trained twice. First they have to be trained to use the
> KDE app with some Windows specific dialogs and later they will have
> to be trained to use the KDE specific dialogs. So instead of making
> migration either we make migration more difficult and more expensive.

Agreed. I think others should realzie that our dialogs are better and=20
use them, not us to use the others. ;-) Really, I think KDE=20
applications should look the same everywhere.The fact that I would like=20
to see GIMP, Qt Designer and others to use KFileDialog is not to get=20
consistency, but to get the power of our dialog.

Andras

=2D-=20
Quanta Plus developer - http://quanta.kdewebdev.org
K Desktop Environment - http://www.kde.org

--nextPart1558323.EmeqVII5RD
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBDEtMuTQdfac6L/08RAgjuAKDhevEH33GbPnI0UeWrNjNh8UbTnQCdEoq0
66sb4FRMDoHX9XtQKK4PtnY=
=hShY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart1558323.EmeqVII5RD--