From kde-core-devel Sun Aug 28 20:48:42 2005 From: "Friedrich W. H. Kossebau" Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2005 20:48:42 +0000 To: kde-core-devel Subject: Re: Redefining kdelibs and kdebase Message-Id: <200508282248.51885.Friedrich.W.H () kossebau ! de> X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kde-core-devel&m=112526195728778 MIME-Version: 1 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="--nextPart5586713.dfccCVERU6" --nextPart5586713.dfccCVERU6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Am Sonntag, 28. August 2005 21:57, schrieb Simon Hausmann: > This is not about restricting our apps, it's about opening up our platform > to embrace more applications. To repeat myself from previous discussions here:=20 Be careful, do not overdue in this direction. Some say this is part of the= =20 famous approach OS/2 took, embracing W*ndows, thus having all people to=20 develop for W*ndows as this way their programs would run on both platforms.= =20 Newer W*ndows features naturally appeared first, you guess, in W*ndows, so= =20 OS/2 was quickly behind. The end of the story is known. You do want to get people to code for KDE, don't you? So think more about h= ow=20 KDE apps can run on more platforms, not so much the other way round. Konqui= =20 rules more than F*refox, doesn't it? My dirty 2 cent on this topic =46riedrich --nextPart5586713.dfccCVERU6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBDEiMzECqmVFXwdrMRAlSbAJ9GjvXvrg7v+x5+DWPNBDiSWr8EWgCgiJ+Z ex2073FzTlmNHnJfrE2sXG4= =/ubY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart5586713.dfccCVERU6--