--nextPart1253370.DaSPV9tN0d
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

On Tuesday 28 June 2005 10:45, Thomas Zander wrote:
> Reiterating from my former mail; showing the user a new (forced) hierarchy
> again is not an improvement over the current situation.

it's not as good as a search & context centric design can and will be, but=
=20
it's certainly an improvement over the current situation where there is no=
=20
single point of entry.

just because something isn't as good as something else, doesn't mean it's n=
ot=20
better than what we have.

i think this is a pragmatic and innexpensive step forward.

=2D-=20
Aaron J. Seigo
GPG Fingerprint: 8B8B 2209 0C6F 7C47 B1EA  EE75 D6B7 2EB1 A7F1 DB43

--nextPart1253370.DaSPV9tN0d
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBCwYZG1rcusafx20MRApywAKCqHmdp6lxSZocdMiKZXDgl5D4z/QCfakQj
4mc9w2MdqimYmZd8cW34fVE=
=2+Rr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart1253370.DaSPV9tN0d--