From kde-core-devel Mon May 30 22:50:26 2005 From: Ingo =?utf-8?q?Kl=C3=B6cker?= Date: Mon, 30 May 2005 22:50:26 +0000 To: kde-core-devel Subject: Re: Moving 3.5 development into branches/KDE/3.5 Message-Id: <200505310050.27208 () erwin ! ingo-kloecker ! de> X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kde-core-devel&m=111749378314063 MIME-Version: 1 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="--nextPart1626232.x151WorEOX" --nextPart1626232.x151WorEOX Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Monday 30 May 2005 22:51, Stephan Kulow wrote: > Am Montag 30 Mai 2005 21:43 schrieb Martijn Klingens: > > On Monday 30 May 2005 21:21, Stephan Kulow wrote: > > > This is a change of policy and was the initial goal. The kde4 > > > work branch was just temporary. The main difference to the > > > current situation is: > > > > > > * KDE4 is the main target, KDE 3.5 development is defined as > > > backport > > > > This collides for the roadmap of KDEPIM that we decided on last > > weekend during the KDEPIM development meeting. KDE 3.5 will be the > > main target until early august for PIM and basically nobody will be > > working on KDE 4 yet. We simply lack the manpower to work on two > > targets, so KDE 4 will have to wait. > > I'm fine with kdepim developers working on KDE 3.5, but not in trunk > and every 3.5 commit has to be merged in trunk. I hope it's possible > in one way or the other. Only if nobody starts to mess around in trunk/KDE/kdepim making merging=20 from 3.5 to trunk a PITA. Note that I reserve the right to revert any=20 changes in trunk/KDE/kdepim/kmail which thwart our efforts to keep life=20 easy for us. Regards, Ingo --nextPart1626232.x151WorEOX Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCm5izGnR+RTDgudgRAtGAAJ4tgD/B3P//8yK7EuXdPHflXWIJtACePSQv gyj+2d9ukxhEI6FIthD7T9k= =RcsM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1626232.x151WorEOX--