[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-core-devel
Subject:    kdereview
From:       Albert Astals Cid <aacid () kde ! org>
Date:       2005-05-21 22:45:54
Message-ID: 200505220045.54871.aacid () kde ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

Currently in kdereview we have knetworkconf, ksynaptics and viki. IIRC they 
have been there for almost 2 months and IMHO this is breaking the purpose of 
kdereview, that is giving some review to programs. So that programs should be 
either approved to be "stable and kde compilant" and decide with the author 
if they have to go to any kde module or to some extragear or either push them 
back to the playground.

What do you think? Should we put a hard maximum time, for example 2 weeks, for 
projects to stay in kdereview?

Albert

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]