--nextPart2351850.ZUZ5QQoV1G
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

Am Freitag, 20. Mai 2005 07:08 schrieb Thiago Macieira:
> Michael Pyne wrote:
> >The theory's all well and good guys, but if people are using a URL, it's
> >because they don't *need* a URI, which generally means they're not doing
> >URI-like things to it. =A0If programs are trying to turn URLs into URIs =
in
> > a class that doesn't design it, they're buggy.
>
> I'm sorry, but reality proves you wrong. People ARE using URIs, even if
> they don't know they are.

Agreed. There's no need to impose additional burden upon the application=20
programmers by making up a class hierarchy of URL/URI representations.
>
> The prime example are mailto: URIs. They are not URLs, yet everyone
> expects them to work with KURL and QUrl.

Don't forget the data: scheme (they are, ironically, called "URLs" in the=20
defining rfc2397 ;-) )

mfg
	Leo

--nextPart2351850.ZUZ5QQoV1G
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBCjebGj5jssenUYTsRAi3UAJ9cyeQPwVj9+LkcfxZtr+hDjbmtBACfZkPU
kE90R8kv3sZICcxgfn/hvdw=
=KLky
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart2351850.ZUZ5QQoV1G--