Hi,
On Tuesday 26 April 2005 21:32, Baris Metin wrote:
> > though I'm not a KDE developer, but a KDE user who wishes a success to
> > the project, I'd like to say a few words on this issue.
> >
> > Even at the moment, from the user's point of view KSpell2 is a very nice
> > lib, IMHO. Why? Take KSpell2 plus ASpell-0.60+, there is no need of
> > manually setting the encoding. All "conversation" with libaspell done in
> > UTF-8, since starting with 0.60 it supports UTF-8 naturally. So, encoding
> > item from Settings->Spellchecker has gone (usability +10). If we imagine
> > that by default KSpell2 uses ASpell, there is no need of setting a
> > backend. So, spellchecking
>
> ... snip ...
>
> I don't share the same idea with you, there will be a need for setting a
> backend in any way. Just for an example, I use newly added zpspell
> (zemberek) backend while I write in Turkish and Ispell (currently) in
> English.

Well also hspell users will want to select backend too.

Regards,
ismail