On Tuesday 26 April 2005 09:21, Stephan Kulow wrote:
> Am Montag 25 April 2005 23:08 schrieb Adriaan de Groot:
> > Is this OK to commit? Renaming is fine by me, I'd probably go with 
> No, it's not. We use other tricks to make apidox work on ktown at all - 
> zeroing out DO_NOT_COMPILE is just one more hack to apply without
> having to polute --help. Because without these hacks, you won't come
> as far without having a qt-devel installed as ktown.

But that's the point: instead of applying unstable hack over hack on ktown itself,
[and basically preventing anyone else from making apidox on their server; keep in
mind that ktown isn't the only webserver generating apidoxes, e.g. there's koffice.org etc.]
why not start doing things clean?
Adriaan's patch is only a beginning, IMHO --enable-apidox (can't we hide it, maybe?)
could do all the necessary 'hacks' for apidox to run on servers.

-- 
David Faure, faure@kde.org, sponsored by Trolltech to work on KDE,
Konqueror (http://www.konqueror.org), and KOffice (http://www.koffice.org).