From kde-core-devel  Sun Apr 10 22:46:45 2005
From: Charles Samuels <charles () kde ! org>
Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2005 22:46:45 +0000
To: kde-core-devel
Subject: Re: SVN timing again
Message-Id: <200504102346.51187.charles () kde ! org>
X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kde-core-devel&m=111317322808873
MIME-Version: 1
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="--nextPart6516352.250RLIsN32"

--nextPart6516352.250RLIsN32
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-6"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

On Sunday 10 April 2005 10:44, Richard Moore wrote:
> On 4/10/05, Michael Brade <brade@kde.org> wrote:
> > Yes, that's my opinion as well. The gains from moving immediately have
> > yet to
> > be explained to me.
>
>   I think the gains are two-fold:
>  1. We will reach a point where we can easily and sensibly branch so we c=
an
> begin doing stuff with Qt 4.
>  2. We no longer have to talk about moving to SVN!
>  Cheers
>  Rich.

We've been using CVS for 8 years (give or take).  Another two weeks is 0.4%=
 of=20
that time.

We can wait another two weeks.

I should also point out that switching VCSs is a major rather major event, =
so=20
will be rather historic not just for the KDE project but also the subversio=
n=20
project.  It is in our best interest to do it right not just for ourselves,=
=20
but to form a model for others projects to switch, which will help SVN=20
improve and thus help the kde project indirectly.

I propose we all stop talking about it until Ossi announces that he's=20
finished :)

=2DCharles

P.S. Apologies for the verbosity

P.P.S., yes, I still think we should wait a year before switching to svn...

--nextPart6516352.250RLIsN32
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBCWazbWS4Pv66UcxkRAiB1AKCQO5/OcBsjMCdOF818qNRsH8B5kgCeJY+Z
+AbHYSzSIicysrsJNlAhxk8=
=mUdD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart6516352.250RLIsN32--