From kde-core-devel  Sat Apr 09 23:59:03 2005
From: Matt Rogers <mattr () kde ! org>
Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2005 23:59:03 +0000
To: kde-core-devel
Subject: Re: SVN timing again
Message-Id: <200504091859.05844.mattr () kde ! org>
X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kde-core-devel&m=111309113526159
MIME-Version: 1
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="--nextPart139140603.KUfeWU2Q1p"

--nextPart139140603.KUfeWU2Q1p
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

On Saturday 09 April 2005 12:54 pm, Stephan Kulow wrote:
> Hi!
>
> The only thing holding SVN conversion currently is the
> fact that we can't track reliably server side moves.
>
> Me and many others aired the opinion, that we lived
> so far without tracked server side moves and won't
> miss it in the future - on the other hand it delays the
> move to subversion where we can move easily.
>
> So my question is: is there demand from kde-core-devel
> to wait more for Ossi to finish that feature or do you
> prefer to skip that and go to subversion right away.
>
> Ossi is talking about two further weeks and having seen
> the how long his original week of delay was - nah, let's
> say we're talking two weeks here. What do you think?
> Wait or move?
>
> Greetings, Stephan

Let's just freakin' move already. people are thinking anoncvs and webcvs=20
downtime are related to the svn move, people are tired of being bombarded=20
with questions about the move, etc. I just don't think that reliably tracki=
ng=20
server side moves from the conversion is all that important.

Matt

--nextPart139140603.KUfeWU2Q1p
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBCWGxJA6Vv5rghv0cRAi3FAKCWcSsNKxUBdNFYfSWIZqAOfI/RcwCgntRg
bsW8QJke4KMzN1BIJARTVa0=
=OURW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart139140603.KUfeWU2Q1p--